Would Parents’ Timing Attitudes Apply to Children’s Timing Perceptions?

Analyses with https://datingmentor.org/local-hookup/edinburgh/ thinking and you may expectations while the created variables don’t possess obvious temporary ordering since the most of the ideational circumstances was basically counted as well at baseline. Parental attitudes fundamentally exists before kid’s attitudes and you may, if you are there may be certain dictate out of children’s perceptions on adult attitudes, the bulk of the latest intergenerational influences in regards to the perceptions generally work from parents to youngsters (Thornton et al. 2008). Next, early in the day studies have shown you to attitudes determine criterion, in the place of traditional influencing attitudes (Fishbein and you will Ajzen 2010). It’s useful, yet not, to keep the potential of mutual causation anywhere between attitudes out of mothers and children in mind once we interpret abilities, and possibility of opposite causation where requirement influence thinking.


Very first, we checked-out hypothesis step 1 from the exploring in the event that children’s marital time thinking be like their parents’ perceptions (Arrow step 1, Fig. step 1 ). Coefficients from linear regression type kid’s better ages from the relationship are given in Dining table step 3 . When parents value more mature decades within marriage, kids is even more probably really worth old age, nevertheless impact dimensions are smaller. Per more 12 months out-of most useful decades offered by a mother and you can father is actually of a rise of 0.05 and 0.07 ages, correspondingly, from inside the kid’s most readily useful decades (Designs step one and you may dos). This type of confident coefficients to possess mothers’ and fathers’ greatest age plus are an equivalent or are some smaller in the event that one or two details was within the same formula (Design 3). Because part estimate for fathers’ most useful ages (0.07) was some larger than that mothers’ (0.05), which difference between the coefficients isn’t statistically tall.

Dining table 3

Coefficients and you may powerful standard mistakes out of normal minimum squares regressions out-of kid’s better decades at marriage (attitudes) (n = 1562)

* p step one ) and theory 3 you to definitely parents’ timing attitudes yourself influence kid’s expectations, internet out of children’s individual perceptions (Arrow step 3, Fig. step 1 ). Brand new purchased logistic regression models of kid’s presumption out-of just how soon they will certainly wed try placed in Table 4 . Models step one–4 level timing perceptions because most useful ages at relationship, while you are Habits 5–8 scale time attitudes of the researching child’s baseline ages into list of acceptable decades.

Dining table cuatro

Children’s and you can mothers’ greatest decades did apply to kid’s traditional. Affirmed, whenever students and their moms and dads respected older most useful decades, college students had been much less likely to expect you’ll wed in the future. Especially, the chances rates getting most readily useful decades in the wedding is actually 0.80 for the children (Design step one) and you will 0.93 to have moms and dads (Model dos) (Dining table cuatro ). By contrast, the chances ratio for father’s finest ages of 0.97 is practically that and never mathematically extreme (Design step three, Desk 4 ). These consequences are also separate; about complete design with all of about three family’s top many years, chances rates hold nearly constant (Model cuatro, Dining table cuatro ).

The purpose quotes recommend child’s individual better years contains the finest affect its standard, if you are mother’s best age is quicker important and you will fathers’ finest age possess a little determine or none after all. Modified Wald examination demonstrate that the odds percentages towards child’s better age differ significantly from the possibility ratios both for mother’s and you may dad’s better decades. However, the effects of mothers’ and you may fathers’ most useful ages on children’s traditional do not disagree significantly.

When calculating timing attitudes by the contrasting children’s ages into the appropriate relationships age brackets for someone of its intercourse, there’s further proof you to definitely college students and mothers was one another important, but in different methods. Whenever children’s years was compared to the their particular timing perceptions, a very clear “too early” impact is offered. When it is more 5 years “too soon,” students provides on the you to-half the chances off looking to wed in the near future than the whenever it’s step three–five years “too early” (Patterns 5 and you may 8). The idea quotes of 1.31 (Model 5) and you will step one.thirty-five (Design 8) advise that if it is the fresh “correct time” pupils have better probability of looking to get married in the future versus if it is 3–5 years “too-soon,” but these consequences aren’t statistically significant. The idea guess for children following next the acceptable assortment, at the 1–24 months “too quickly,” implies he or she is some more likely to expect you’ll wed in the future which have part prices of 1.17 (Design 5) and you can 1.thirteen (Model 8), nevertheless these consequences are also not statistically extreme.